News

PC Polycarbonate (PC)
PMMA Acrylic (PMMA)

PC vs PMMA — Quel plastique choisir ?

Comprehensive Technical Comparison: Mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties, ease of injection, and cost. By Hybster's materials engineers.

⚖️ Open in the interactive comparator →

Overview — Performance profile

Overall scores

Mechanics
75
60
PC PMMA
Thermal
75
40
PC PMMA
Chemical
55
40
PC PMMA
UV ageing
55
90
PC PMMA
Process
55
65
PC PMMA
Aesthetics
85
95
PC PMMA
Sustainability
80
65
PC PMMA
Cost
55
65
PC PMMA

PC vs PMMA : différences clés

The PC and the PMMA are two plastic materials frequently put in competition when selecting material for injection-moulded parts. This technical comparison helps you identify the most suitable material for your specifications.

The PC supporte des températures plus élevées (HDT 130 °C contre 95 °C pour le PMMA), ce qui le rend plus adapté aux environnements chauds.

On the pull PC est plus résistant (60 MPa contre 37.1 MPa pour le PMMA).

the chemical resistance du PC est supérieure à celle du PMMA (55/100 contre 40/100).

The PMMA s'injecte plus facilement (difficulté 3/5 contre 4/5 pour le PC).

The PMMA offre un meilleur rapport coût/performance à la transformation (65/100 contre 55/100 pour le PC).

Technical properties compared

Properties PC PMMA Standard
Identification
Family Polycarbonate (PC) Acrylic (PMMA)
Reinforcement / Rank
Process Injection Moulding Injection Moulding
UL94 Rating HB HB UL 94
General properties
Density g/cm³ 1.23 to 1.26 (ASTM D792) 1.13 to 1.19 (ASTM D792); 1.16 to 1.19 (ISO 1183) ISO 1183
Mechanical properties
Tensile strength (MPa) 60 37.1 to 76.8 (ASTM D638); 37.0 to 70.6 (ASTM D638, Break); 44.0 to 73.5 (ASTM D638, Yield); 6.67 to 85.0 (ISO 527-1, -2); 41.0 to 77.0 (ISO 527-1, -2, Yield); 36.5 to 78.5 (ISO 527-1, -2, Break) ISO 527
Tensile modulus (MPa) 2300 1310 to 3800 (ASTM D638); 3150 to 3330 (ISO 527-1) ISO 527
Tensile strain (%) 0.80 to 220 (ISO 527-1, -2, Break) 2.4 to 6.8 (ASTM D638, Break); 3.0 to 12 (ASTM D638, Yield); 2.0 to 6.7 (ISO 527-1, -2, Break); 6.5 to 48 (ISO 527-1, -2, Break); 3.9 to 5.1 (ISO 527-1, -2, Yield) ISO 527
Bending strength (MPa) 90 100 ISO 178
Bending modulus (MPa) 1590 to 1780 (ISO 178) 1700 to 3510 (ASTM D790); 1.50 to 4100 (ISO 178) ISO 178
Charpy impact strength (kJ/m²) 0.90 to 7.5 1.2 to 3.0 ISO 179
Thermal properties
Glass transition temperature (Tg) (°C) 147 105 DSC
HDT / A Temp (°C) 130 95 ISO 75-A
Minimum operating temperature (°C) -40 -40
Maximum operating temperature (°C) 120 80
Transformation temperature (°C) 270 200
Withdrawal on moulding (%) 0.5 0.2 ISO 2577
Performance scores (stars /5)
Mechanical performance
Thermal clothing
Chemical resistance
UV ageing
Ease of injection
Recycling
Special properties
Transparent
Food Contact
Recycled
Biobased
flame-retardant
UV resistant

⚠️ The values shown are typical orders of magnitude for standard grades. Always consult the supplier's datasheet for the exact grade selected.

PC Choose whether…
Temperature held above
💪 Best mechanical properties
Best chemical resistance
Full PC sheet

Our recommendation

In summary, the PC is preferable for high-temperature applications and high mechanical stresses, whereas the PMMA it is preferable in order to optimise the cost price. The final choice depends on the specifications of your part — our Hybster materials engineers can accompany you.

Vous hésitez encore entre PC et PMMA pour votre projet ? Nos ingénieurs matières analysent votre cahier des charges gratuitement.

📞 Request a free material analysis
PMMA Choose whether…
Best cost-performance ratio
⚙️ Easier to inject
Best process aptitude
Fiche complète PMMA →

Questions fréquentes — PC vs PMMA

Un projet nécessitant du PC ou du PMMA ?

Hybster designs and manufactures your plastic injection moulded parts from Lille. Design office, tooling, injection 50 to 2,000 T, assembly.