Rapid prototyping: a comparison of injection moulding and 3D printing?
You may have read, here or there, that 3D printing would replace plastic injection in the longer or shorter term. Our opinion isn't quite as clear-cut!
Originally considered to be competing technologies, These techniques are now widely recognized as each having unique advantages and can even be used together to help maximize production efficiency.
This is why we thought it was important to create this comparison between plastic injection moulding and 3D printing?
The use of 3D printing in innovative and experimental scenarios is frequently shown in the media, but the reality is that the majority of today's plastic parts are made by injection molding. This choice is understandable given the way the process allows for quality control, cost control and the manufacture of complex assemblies, by injection moulding or bi-material injection with tight tolerances.
3D printing and the Plastic injection molding are both useful and competitive processes, as are cnc machining by shooting or milling.
3D printing has given engineers the ability to create plastic models from their desks and bring them to life in a matter of hours. Injection molding, on the other hand, is synonymous with quality and value. It is commonly used to quickly and reliably produce large volumes of complex plastic designs.
For project leaders, startups or manufacturers who are wondering if plastic injection molding or 3D printing is the right process for their next project, we'll explain when to use each technique and how they can be used collectively to support each other.
plastic injection vs. 3D printing
Obviously, 3D printer or resin manufacturers will tell you that 3D printed parts are resistant, and capable of this or that, and that is generally TRUE!
The same applies to the parts injection moulded plastics Plastic.
The most important point is knowing where you come from in order to understand where you're going! (That's philosophical, isn't it?)
Injection moulding melts and injects a polymer under pressure into a mould to form a part in a short cycle of a few seconds. 3D printing deposits or solidifies material layer by layer over hours, without a mould. Injection moulding is aimed at industrial production runs, while 3D printing is for prototypes or small series.
Prefer 3D printing for: rapid prototypes, small series (fewer than 500-1000 units), complex parts impossible with injection moulding (internal undercuts, non-ejectable geometries), rapid design iterations, or customisation per part. Injection moulding becomes more cost-effective beyond 1,000 to 2,000 pieces depending on product complexity.
For 1 piece: 3D printing costs €50-500 vs injection moulding (tooling to amortise) is inaccessible. For 1,000 pieces: 3D printing €50,000-500,000 accumulated vs injection moulding €15,000 mould + €1-5/piece = €16,000-20,000 total. 3D printing becomes prohibitive for large industrial production runs.
Plastic injection offers typical tolerances of ±0.1 to ±0.3 mm, with excellent repeatability over millions of identical parts. 3D printing presents tolerances of ±0.2 to ±0.5 mm with a visibly striated surface quality. Injection remains superior in dimensional accuracy and finish for mass production.
Yes, it's even a common strategy: 3D printing for rapid prototyping (shape, ergonomics, mechanical validation), then transitioning to injection moulding for series production. 3D printing can also be used to produce temporary tooling (jigs, silicone mould masters) before the definitive investment in a series mould.